- September 10th, 2019, 10:13 am
#108394
I hate to see another Rock-O-Plane potentially hit the graveyard.
KeepPounding9213 wrote:The question is we do know yes that Carowinds can use another dry water ride or 2 but will Cedar Fair take the time out to invest in newer dry water rides when park has none to begin with. Not counting Carolina harbor. I mean again it’s the only cedar fair park without a dry water ride. Maybe cedar fair doesn’t care that they don’t have any dry water rides in the park or like I keep bringing up they’re afraid to build a fluke after what happened to shoot the rapids at Cedar Point but thats Intamin. If carowinds goes without 1 dry water ride in the next decade what do you think about that? Screamscape has said antique auto cars are coming to replace Dino’s I’ve been following them since high school not sure if their the best theme park source.
Kw6sTheater wrote: However, someone has told me that antique cars are rumored to replace Dinosaurs Alive
Kw6sTheater wrote:To be honest, I don't see Cedar Fair installing a family coaster - at least, one any smaller than Copperhead Strike - any time soon. They like to put in one or two large scale coasters per year, as evidenced by the trend of 1 coaster a year from 2014 to 2017, 4 in 2018, 2 in 2019 and then back to one in 2020. I'd very much like to see a family boomerang come to any Cedar Fair park, as it's a compact addition that can please both the families and thrill seekers, and rather inexpensive as well.
But thinking realistically, I could see Carowinds either RMCing Hurler or getting a GCI in the Dinosaurs Alive plot for their next major coaster. However, someone has told me that antique cars are rumored to replace Dinosaurs Alive, in which case the GCI could possibly fit in with the manmade hill that Rip Roarin' Rapids sat on. I see Rip Roarin' Rapids' plot being used for a Forbidden Frontier-style experience, though, since they can easily reuse the preexisting structures and won't need to remove the preexisting hill. The only other plot of land I could see this coaster utilizing is possibly the replacement of Nighthawk - Firehawk has been removed already, so I'm sure that Nighthawk has some updated parts from it, but it's likely on borrowed time.
coasterbruh wrote:It's capacity, popular and in an area that isn't needed.
yawetag wrote:coasterbruh wrote:It's capacity, popular and in an area that isn't needed.
The capacity is horrible.
yawetag wrote:coasterbruh wrote:It's capacity, popular and in an area that isn't needed.
The capacity is horrible.
coasterbruh wrote:The problem with Volcano is that is it was problematic. Unfortunately, Nighthawk is not problematic and with firehawk parts arriving at the park, I think we can forget about it leaving anytime soon. It's capacity, popular and in an area that isn't needed.
tarheel1231 wrote:yawetag wrote:coasterbruh wrote:It's capacity, popular and in an area that isn't needed.
The capacity is horrible.
I think he’s referring to the fact that it adds capacity to the park, not necessarily the efficiency. But even so, it’s the fifth most ridden attraction at the park, it’s a crowd-pleaser, and it just came into a windfall of spare parts. Nighthawk’s here to stay for at least another decade or two, even though most of us on this site want it gone.